copied and slpit from https://forums.flaregames.com/t/please-fix-duplicate-unique-items/33733 …
i know i asked about this several times (see e.g.
) and i know also the answer from the june/july section may be answered shortly…
i dont know if i missunderstand the given description of the refineing of uniques right (see https://forums.flaregames.com/t/version-4-2-0-may-the-forge-be-with-you/15898 ):
in particular the sencences “Dismantling a Silver- or Gold-Star item to Forge a Unique Item will add additional Perks from the item you dismantled, allowing you to have up to 4 stats on any Unique Item. Doing this will also raise it to the maximum power for your Ascension Level.”
my understanding from this has been the following (and i wonder if i am wrong):
- the values of the perks on the unique can not be influenced and become their max. values
- there is no need to forge or refine this unique first
- BUT: and this cannot be seen before a try - DO THE TRANSFERRED PERKS DEPEND ON THE VALUES OF THE PERKS ON THE DISMANTELED ITEM?
- and after the transfer, are the taken to the highest quality this unique can offer - or does a weak perk (not the main one) of the unique has no influence
so i made a test that i want to share and that i want to ask in addition:
i took a rather weak gold 5-star titan on my best claws
my questions are now:
beside the orignial destruction perk, would the result have been different to the one above if i did this instead? (i ask for the values of the transferred perks)
and in addition what would be the result of the first “experiment” if i would have used a 5-star titan gold-cycle item with the same perks as above but with values of the perks to be transferred of lets assume their values doubled… would e.g. the new transferred perks on the unique also have double values, because the transfer is independet or the same process than like for a normal item and just bc it is a unique item these values are raised to their max. values AFTERWARDS?
(i have a bad feeling like this might be the case now, and once again i missunderstood the very short and maybe missleading description … so sad)