Hi everyone just trying to get some feedback from the community since I’m a big fan of many of your posts.
I recently started an alliance with some facebook friends. With the goal of having a quality place to develop Alts while main characters continue in the great alliances they’re in.
However, as alliance leader I recently opened the group to new members as well. I have a few mandatory rules that seem to bother these new members we don’t know.
All members must go to the alliance leader board and choose a base layout used by a top 10 alliance member and copy it to their own base.
All members need to be at the mandatory minimum 50k donation within a reasonable length of time.
3.All members engage in alliance chat by sharing tips,feedback,jokes,strategy,etc
- Be active during war season, improve your offense/defense any have fun playing the game. Were a team
Are these rules unreasonable? I’ve been getting feedback ranging from “Why should I upgrade the alliance tower?” to "Why do i have to change my base to look like these guys? I like my base the way it is.
I want this project to work and membership to grow but not at the cost of this alliance becoming a rest haven for lazy players and their weak pathetic bases. I wont have these few ruining wars for the entire team.
We are small and just starting but i hope to recruit many smart low level players who recently started a new alt and learned from the mistakes made on their main character. Strong donation power, stress free game play, fun low level wars, sneaky war tactics, trophy strength camouflage, alliance infiltration, you name it, we can try it.
But, with all the push back from clueless players should I just go back to apply and invite only? I’m thinking about it.
What do you all think?